Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 276 Kan. 164 - State v. Vandervort

State v. Vandervort’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

104
cited by 104 later decisions
1
states following
July 2024
most recently cited

104 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 104 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably State v. Dickey (2015), State v. Wetrich (2018)

104 state decisions

620200320102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Oregon v. Mathiason · California v. Beheler · Stansbury v. California · Roberts v. United States · State v. Gould

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 104 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[f]or purposes of determining criminal history, the offenses need only be comparable, not identical.”
    12 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “"(1) Out-of-state convictions and juvenile adjudications shall be used in classifying the offender's criminal history. "(2) An out-of-state crime will be classified as either a felony or a misdemeanor according to the convicting jurisdiction: .... "(3) The state of Kansas shall classify the crime as person or nonperson. In designating a crime as person or nonperson, comparable offenses under the Kansas criminal code in effect on the date the current crime of conviction was committed shall be referred to. If the state of Kansas does not have a comparable offense in effect on the date the current crime of conviction was committed, the out-of-state conviction shall be classified as a nonperson crime." K.S.A. 2018 Supp. 21-6811(e).”
    11 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the closest approximation of Kansas statutes to”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.