Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 276 Md. 541 - Erbe v. State

Erbe v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

81
cited by 81 later decisions
11
states following
April 2020
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 76 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 81 later decisions — most recently April 2020 · most notably State v. Frazier (1984), State v. Gee (1984)

2 federal appellate · 76 state decisions — followed in 11 states

300197619801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Brady v. State of Maryland · Boykin v. Alabama · Barker v. Wingo · United States v. Marion

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 81 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he delay that can be tolerated for an ordinary street crime is considerably less than for a serious, complex conspiracy charge.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A deliberate attempt to delay the trial in order to hamper the defense should be weighted heavily against the government. A more neutral reason such as negligence or overcrowded courts should be weighted less heavily but nevertheless should be considered since the ultimate responsibility for such circumstances must rest with the government rather than with the defendant. Finally, a valid reason, such as a missing witness, should serve to justify appropriate delay.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “failure to assert the right will make it difficult for a defendant to prove that he was denied a speedy trial.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.