Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 276 N.C. 598 - State v. Sanders

State v. Sanders’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

97
cited by 97 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
May 2002
most recently cited

95 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 97 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2002 · most notably State v. Hutchins (1981), State v. Westbrook (1971)

95 state decisions

7001970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1201 (International Parental Kidnapping Crime Act of 1993)

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Brady v. United States · Witherspoon v. Illinois · Bumper v. North Carolina · Spencer v. State of Texas a Bell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 97 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Pursuant to the mandate of the Supreme Court of the United States, this cause is remanded to the Superior Court of Edgecombe County with directions to proceed as follows: "1. The presiding judge of the Superior Court of Edgecombe County will cause to be served on the defendant, Marie Hill, and on her attorneys of record, notice to appear during a session of said superior court at a designated time, not less than ten days from the date of the order, at which time, in open court, the defendant, Marie Hill, being present in person and being represented by her attorneys, the presiding judge, based on the verdict of guilty of murder in the first degree returned by the jury at the trial at the December 16, 1968 Criminal Session, will pronounce judgment that the defendant, Marie Hill, be imprisoned for life in the State's prison. "2. The presiding judge of the Superior Court of Edgecombe County will issue a writ of habeas corpus to the official having custody of the defendant, Marie Hill, to produce her in open court at the time and for the purpose of being present when the judgment imposing life imprisonment is pronounced. "Remanded for judgment."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. ““ . . . Premeditation means ‘thought beforehand’ for some length of time, however short. [Citation omitted.] This Court said in State v. Benson, 183 N.C. 795 , 111 S.E. 869 : ‘Deliberation means ... an intention to kill, executed by the defendant in a cool state of blood, in furtherance of a fixed design ... or to accomplish some unlawful purpose, and not under the influence of a violent passion, suddenly aroused by some lawful or just cause or legal provocation.’ [Citations omitted.] No fixed amount of time is required for the mental processes of premeditation and deliberation constituting an element of the offense of murder in the first degree, it being sufficient if these mental processes occur prior to, and not simultaneously with, the killing. [Citations omitted.]””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “"Q. On account of that moral or religious scruple, or scruples would it be impossible under any circumstances and in any event for you to return a verdict of guilty of murder in the first degree and rape knowing at the time that the defendant would be sentenced to death? "A. Yes, sir, I couldn't do it. * * * * * * "Q. If you were chosen to sit on this jury, are you saying that you would not under any circumstances give any consideration to returning a verdict which would involve the death penalty? "A. No, sir. "Q. That is what you are saying? "A. That is what I am saying, I couldn't do it."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.