Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 276 NEB 313 - State v. Hense

State v. Hense’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
1
states following
March 2025
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 37 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently March 2025 · most notably State v. Henry (2016), Lustgraaf v. Behrens (2010)

2 federal appellate · 37 state decisions

170200820102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Monge v. California · Monge v. California · State v. Vasquez · State v. Schall · State v. Neiss

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “period of fifteen years from the date ordered by the court,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The judgment of the court in any action taken pursuant to section 29-2315.01 shall not be reversed nor in any manner affected when the defendant in the trial court has been placed legally in jeopardy, but in such cases the decision of the appellate court shall determine the law to govern in any similar case which may be pending at the time the decision is rendered or which may thereafter arise in the state. When the decision of the appellate court establishes that the final order of the trial court was erroneous and the defendant had not been placed legally in jeopardy prior to the entry of such erroneous order, the trial court may upon application of the prosecuting attorney issue its warrant for the rearrest of the defendant and the cause against him or her shall thereupon proceed in accordance with the law as determined by the decision of the appellate court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “administered upon sentencing, upon final judgment of any appeal or review, or upon the date that any probation is revoked.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.