Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 276 NW2D 823 - State v. Holmes

State v. Holmes’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
3
states following
July 2014
most recently cited

24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently July 2014 · most notably State v. Rich (1981), 342 Pa. Super. 58 - Commonwealth v. Cooke (1985)

24 state decisions

16019791980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Woodson v. North Carolina · Jurek v. Texas · Roberts v. Louisiana · State v. Freeman · Stewart v. Iowa

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A person commits a robbery when, having the intent to commit a theft, the person does any of the following acts to assist or further the commission of the intended theft or the person’s escape from the scene thereof with or without the stolen property: 1. Commits an assault upon another. 2. Threatens another with or purposely puts another in fear of immediate serious injury. 3. Threatens to commit immediately any forcible felony. It is immaterial to the question of guilt or innocence of robbery that property was or was not actually stolen.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[taking] possession or control of the property of another, or property in the possession of another, with the intent to deprive the other thereof.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.