Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 276 ORAPP 208 - State v. Guzman

State v. Guzman’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “when the defendant slapped her was insufficient to support a finding of substantial pain). At least some evidence raised the issue of duration and supported defendant's requested instruction. The related question is whether the requested instruction was unnecessary. In Roberts , we concluded that a special instruction was necessary when the record contained evidence from which a factfinder could infer that the victim's pain was”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “no other evidence of the degree of the pain or that it was anything more than a fleeting sensation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “As for the duration of the pain, we have repeatedly emphasized that fleeting pain is insufficient.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.