State v. Guzman’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“when the defendant slapped her was insufficient to support a finding of substantial pain). At least some evidence raised the issue of duration and supported defendant's requested instruction. The related question is whether the requested instruction was unnecessary. In Roberts , we concluded that a special instruction was necessary when the record contained evidence from which a factfinder could infer that the victim's pain was”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“no other evidence of the degree of the pain or that it was anything more than a fleeting sensation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“As for the duration of the pain, we have repeatedly emphasized that fleeting pain is insufficient.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.