State v. Pilgrim’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the burden is on the state to prove that the warrantless search did not violate a protected interest of the defendant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“within one of the few specifically established and carefully delineated exceptions to the warrant requirement.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.