Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

276 S.C. 183

Berryhill v. State

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 9, 1981

Supreme Court of South Carolina · decided 1981-04-09

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently February 1984

1 state decisions

Relies on Anders v. California · State v. Johnson · State v. Murrell

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1981-04-09

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam:

¶1Appellant and two codefendants were found guilty of armed robbery and each was sentenced to imprisonment for twenty-three (23) years.

¶2Appellant applied for Post-Conviction Relief and his application was denied after an evidentiary hearing. This appeal followed.

¶3Counsel for appellant has filed a brief under authority of Anders v. California, 386 U. S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. (2d) 493 (1967), asserting that there are no meritorious grounds for appeal and requesting permission to withdraw from further representation. Appellant has not filed a pro se brief. . : . I ■! "'pH

¶4During the pendency of this appeal appellant escaped from custody. We decline to hear the appeal of a party who by his escape has evaded the process of the Court and refuses to submit himself to its jurisdiction. State v. Murrell, 33 S. C. 83, 11 S. E. 682 (1890); State v. Johnson, 44 S. C. 556, 21 S. E. 806 (1895). Accordingly, it is ordered that this appeal be dismissed and counsel’s request to withdraw is granted.

/276/sc/183 · .json · Public domain