Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 276 S.C. 29 - Jackson v. River Pines, Inc.

Jackson v. River Pines, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
3
states following
September 2006
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Rutledge v. Dodenhoff · Lane v. Trenholm Building Company · Mitchell v. Pinckney

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When land is conveyed, there is often no clearly defined objective in the transfer and it would be impossible to imply a warranty of fitness for any purpose. Even when a particular purpose is contemplated, as, for example, by restrictive covenants, the suitability of the land may depend on architectural proposals or other matters entirely independent of the conveyance. Finally, the purchaser can fully inspect undeveloped land and, therefore, when the law denies the purchaser of real estate the benefit of an implied warranty, the consequences are generally not unfair or unjust. (Emphasis ours.) 229 S. E. (2d) at page 730 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.