Baumrind v. Ewing’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently October 2003
6 federal appellate · 9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2511 (Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986)
Relies on Securities Investor Protection Corp. v. Barbour · Rickenbaker v. Rickenbaker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Except as otherwise specifically provided in this chapter any person who — "(a) willfully intercepts, endeavors to intercept, or procures any other person to intercept or endeavor to intercept, any wire or oral communication;”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“"shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years, or both."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.