Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 276 SE2D 550 - State v. WJB

State v. WJB’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
2
states following
May 2016
most recently cited

28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently May 2016 · most notably 169 W. Va. 191 - State v. Hatfield (1982), State v. Pellegrino (1998)

28 state decisions

1201981199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Payton v. New York · Burks v. United States · 161 W. Va. 517 - State v. Starkey · 12 Cal. 3d 470 - People v. Ceballos · Rivera v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] defendant who is not the aggressor and has reasonable grounds to believe, and actually does believe, that he is in imminent danger of death or serious bodily harm from which he could save himself only by using deadly force against his assailant has the right to employ deadly force in order to defend himself.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The occupant of a dwelling is not limited in using deadly force against an unlawful intruder to the situation where the occupant is threatened with serious bodily injury or death, but he may use deadly force if the unlawful intruder threatens imminent physical violence or the commission of a felony and the occupant reasonably believes deadly force is necessary.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “the amount of force that can be used in self-defense is that normally one can return deadly force only if he reasonably believes that the assailant is about to inflict death or serious bodily harm; otherwise, where he is threatened only with non-deadly force, he may use only non-deadly force in return.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.