Davis v. Solomon’s Empirical Analysis
1955
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently May 2016
2 federal appellate · 9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Moore v. Louisville Hydro-Electric Co. · Morrison v. Carbide and Carbon Chemicals Corp. · Ashland Iron & Mining Co. v. McDaniel · Taylor's Administrator v. Bates & Rogers Construction Co. · Sturgill's Administrator v. Howard
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It seems clear to us that in the event of an accident arising out of and in the course of employment, where the employer and employee have elected to operate under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, compensation may only be obtained in a proceeding before the Workmen’s Compensation Board (except for an intentional injury inflicted by the employer as provided in KRS 342.015(2)). The Board has original and exclusive jurisdiction of all claims within the purview of the Act. Ashland Iron & Mining Co. v. McDaniel’s Dependents, 202 Ky. 19 , 258 S.W. 943 ; Moore v. Louisville Hydro-Electric Co., 226 Ky. 20 , 10 S.W.2d 466 . The purposes of the Act would be defeated if independent actions to recover damages for injuries or death caused by a compensable accident were permitted. Sturgill’s Adm’r v. Howard, 218 Ky. 57 , 290 S.W. 1048 ; Morrison v. Carbide & Carbon Chemicals Corporation, 278 Ky. 746 , 129 S.W.2d 547 .””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““Where at the time of the injury both employer and employe have elected to furnish or accept compensation under the provisions of this chapter for a traumatic personal injury, received by an employe by accident and arising out of and in the course of his employment . . . the employer shall be liable to provide and pay compensation under the provisions of this chapter and shall, except as provided in subsection (2) of this section and in KRS 342.170, be released from all other liability.” (Emphasis added).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.