Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 276 SW3D 138 - Murray v. Murray

Murray v. Murray’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Worford v. Stamper · In the Interest of W.E.R. · Busby v. Busby · State v. Heal · IKB Industries (Nigeria) Ltd. v. Pro-Line Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When ... the trial court makes no separate findings of fact or conclusions of law, we draw every reasonable inference supported by the record in favor of the trial court's judgment.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “We must then affirm the judgment of the trial court on any legal theory that finds support in the evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.