King v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
August 2018
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Boylan · Shane v. Commonwealth · Mabe v. Commonwealth · Bell v. Commonwealth · St. Clair v. Commonwealth
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The true test of whether a juror should be stricken for cause is whether “... the prospective juror can conform his views to the requirements of the law and render a fair and impartial verdict.” Thompson v. Commonwealth, 147 S.W.3d 22, 51 (Ky. 2004), quoting Mabe v. Commonwealth, 884 S.W.2d 668, 671 (Ky. 1994).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Kays v. Commonwealth
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.