Kirsch v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
June 2015
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Matlock · Almanza v. State · Johnson v. State · Romero v. State · Hooper v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Let's focus on the specifics. The instruction that you got when [the BAC-test result] came in, that was given to you to consider that particular evidence at that particular time in the trial. That instruction is gone now.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Kirsch v. State“they tend to make it more probable that [the defendant] was intoxicated at the time of driving under both the per se and impairment definitions of intoxication”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Kirsch v. State“[t]o the extent that the instruction said the test could only show appellant ingested alcohol, the instruction was erroneous.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Kirsch v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.