Jaynes v. Com.’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
20 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 7701 (§ 2 of the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003)
Relies on Broadrick v. Oklahoma · United States v. Salerno · Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc. · New York v. Ferber · Stromberg v. People of State of California
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Nevertheless, construing statutes to cure constitutional deficiencies is allowed only when such construction is reasonable. A statute cannot be rewritten to bring it within constitutional requirements.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“a state may exercise jurisdiction over criminal acts that are committed outside the state, but are intended to, and do in fact, produce harm within the state”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Chase“that no set of circumstances exists under which the [statute] would be valid, i.e., that the law is unconstitutional in all of its applications.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.