Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 276 Va. 629 - Fruiterman v. Granata

Fruiterman v. Granata’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
3
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 23 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Naccash v. Burger · Harris v. Kreutzer · Brown v. Koulizakis · Bulala v. Boyd · Dehn v. Edgecombe

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]rmed with a jury verdict approved by the trial court, ... stands in 'the most favored position known to the law.' " Bitar v. Rahman , 272 Va. 130 , 137, 630 S.E.2d 319 , 323 (2006) (quoting Ravenwood Towers, Inc. v. Woodyard , 244 Va. 51 , 57, 419 S.E.2d 627 , 630 (1992) ). When a trial court has refused to strike a plaintiff's evidence or to set aside a jury verdict, the well-established standard of appellate review requires this Court to determine whether the evidence presented at trial, taken in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, was sufficient to support the jury verdict in favor of the plaintiff. Id . at 141, 630 S.E.2d at 325 -26 . We will not set aside a trial court's judgment sustaining a jury verdict unless it is "plainly wrong or without evidence to support it.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[i]t is ancient learning that one who assumes to act, even though gratuitously, may thereby become subject to the duty of acting carefully, if he acts at all.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “a physician [must] personally engage[ ] in some affirmative act amounting to a render[ing of] services to another.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.