Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 276 Va. 674 - Hasan v. Com.

Hasan v. Com.’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Berkemer v. McCarty · California v. Beheler · Riner v. Com. · McCain v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Th[is] arguments, which [is] in the nature of a harmless error analysis, [is] inapplicable to this case. Even if the Commonwealth is correct about the inevitable discovery of the weapon ..., Hasan entered a conditional guilty plea pursuant to Code § 19.2-254, which provides in part that “[i]f the defendant prevails on appeal, he shall be allowed to withdraw his plea.” Hasan has prevailed on appeal regarding suppression of the statement at issue in this case. He is entitled by statute to withdraw his plea. Hasan must be given the opportunity to reassess the admissible evidence that may be used against him and, if the Commonwealth wishes to continue its prosecution, demand a trial if he so desires.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “a reasonable person in the suspect's situation”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.