Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 277 A.2d 650 - Karath v. Generalis

Karath v. Generalis’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
May 2004
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently May 2004

11 state decisions

501971198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 411 · 29 U.S.C. § 413

Relies on Securities and Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corporation · Garner v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs & Helpers Local Union No. 776 · National Labor Relations Board v. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co. · Local 357, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers v. National Labor Relations Board · International Association Machinists v. Gonzales

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]t is not necessary for a trial court to make findings and if the record discloses some valid ground for supporting its judgment, it should not be disturbed on appeal.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.