Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

277 A.D.2d 331

Potter v. Heffernan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1950-09-19

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently September 2007

3 federal appellate ·

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1950-09-19

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1We agree that the time between September 2 and midnight of September 9, 1950, within which independent nominating petitions might be obtained and filed was an adequate, sufficient and reasonable period. On the law applicable to the state of facts herein disclosed, the court should not have extended the time to file independent nominating petitions expressly fixed by chapter 329 of the Laws of 1950 (Election Law, § 314, subd. 11). Accordingly the last three decretal paragraphs numbered 1, 2 and 3 of the order appealed from should be deleted. In all other respects, the order denying the motion to enjoin the election of a Mayor at the ensuing general election should be affirmed.

¶2Leave is hereby granted to appeal to the Court of Appeals.

/277/ad2d/331 · .json · Public domain