Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

277 Ala. 647

Hodson v. Hodson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 8, 1965

Supreme Court of Alabama · decided 1965-04-08

Relies on Carlisle v. McCleskey

Decided 1965-04-08

COLEMAN, Justice

¶1(concurring specially) .

¶2I agree that application to this Court for leave to file a bill in the nature of a bill of review is not required, although the original decree in this cause was affirmed by this Court. Ex parte Carlisle, 265 Ala. 474, 92 So.2d 33, should be, and is, expressly overruled.

¶3The application to this Court in the instant case should be dismissed.

LAWSON, SIMPSON, GOODWYN, MERRILL and HARWOOD, JJ., concur.
/277/ala/647 · .json · Public domain