Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 277 Ark. 129 - Green v. State

Green v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
2
states following
September 2006
most recently cited

23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently September 2006 · most notably Maulding v. State (1989), 274 N.J. Super. 285 - State v. Gallagher (1994)

23 state decisions

150198219902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Douglas v. People of State of California · Douglas v. California

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A criminal appellant is presented the choice of proceeding with or without an attorney. For those who want an attorney but cannot afford one, counsel is appointed. . . . There is no constitutional right to file a handwritten brief. If a pro se appellant cannot for some reason use or obtain the use of a typewriter, then he should consider allowing an attorney to perfect the appeal.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Long v. State · Howard v. Lockhart
  2. “All state and federal courts have adopted rules for the administration of justice. The rules of an appellate court are intended to expedite the court’s consideration of matters presented to it. The prompt and orderly disposition of cases depends in part on standards which control the content, length and form of the appeal brief.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Maulding v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.