Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 277 ARK 72 - Boreck v. State

Boreck v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
March 1991
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Klimas v. State · Simpson v. State · Shepherd v. State · Haight v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The trial judge has considerable discretion in determining the scope of cross-examination. Rules 403 and 611(b) Unif. Rules of Evid. . . . Shepherd v. State, 270 Ark. 457 , 605 S.W.2d 414 (1980). However, we have consistently taken a broad view of the right of an accused in a criminal prosecution to be confronted with the witness against him.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.