In re Ponzini’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 109 · 11 U.S.C. § 1307 · 11 U.S.C. § 706 · 28 U.S.C. § 157
Relies on Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc. · Calder v. Job · Finney v. Smith · Nelson v. Easley (In Re Easley) · Street v. Lawson (In Re Street)
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If the right to convert were absolute, there would be no need to file a motion, notify creditors, and have a hearing; those procedures would be useless and meaningless.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Rigales
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.