Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 277 B.R. 5 - Renaissance Cosmetics, Inc. v. Development Specialists Inc.

Renaissance Cosmetics, Inc. v. Development Specialists Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
March 2019
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1334 · 28 U.S.C. § 1404 · 28 U.S.C. § 1412 · 28 U.S.C. § 1452 · 28 U.S.C. § 157

Relies on Cooney v. Osgood Machinery, Inc. · Maiello v. NYS BD. OF PAROLE · Southmark Corporation Southmark Corporation v. Coopers & Lybrand · Iragorri v. United Technologies Corp. · Matter of Allstate Ins. Co.(stolarz-Njm)

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “in state court; and (6) the action is capable of being”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(1) the effect on the efficient administration of the bankruptcy estate; (2) the extent to which issues of state law predominate; (3) the difficulty or unsettled nature of the applicable state law; (4) comity; (5) the degree of relatedness or remoteness of the proceeding to the main bankruptcy case; (6) the existence of the right to a jury trial; and (7) prejudice to the involuntary removed defendants.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[N]othing in this section prevents a district court in the interest of justice, or in the interest of comity with State courts or respect for State law, from abstaining from hearing a particular proceeding arising under title 11 or arising in or related to a case under title 11.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.