The Creole

Decided November 7, 1921.)

Second Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1921-11-07

Cross-libels by the Carmichael Ship Company against the steamship Creole, of which the Southern Pacific Steamship Company was claimant and by the Southern Pacific Steamship Company against the schooner James William, in which the Carmichael Ship Company was claimant, to recover damages for a collision. From a decree finding the steamer solely at fault (277 Fed. 119), the Southern Pacific Steamship Company appeals.

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently December 1924

1 federal appellate · 1 district ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on The Creole

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed · Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1921-11-07

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.

¶2Cross-libels by the Carmichael Ship Company against the steamship Creole, of which the Southern Pacific Steamship Company was claimant and by the Southern Pacific Steamship Company against the schooner James William, in which the Carmichael Ship Company was claimant, to recover damages for a collision. From a decree finding the steamer solely at fault (277 Fed. 119), the Southern Pacific Steamship Company appeals.

¶3Affirmed.

¶4 *123Xirlin, Woolsey, Campbell, Hickox & Keating, of New York City (Robert S. Erskine, Harry D. Thirkield, and Carleton L,. Marsh, all of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

¶5Burlingham, Veeder, Hasten & Eearey, of New York City (Chauncey I. Clark, of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.

¶6Before ROGERS, MANTON, and MACK, Circuit Judges.

¶7PER CURIAM.

¶8Decree affirmed.