In re Weidenfeld’s Empirical Analysis
277 F. 59 · 1921
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently November 2015
5 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Whitney v. Dresser · Travelers Insurance v. Prewitt · Spencer v. Lowe · In re Wooten · In re Royce Dry Goods Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The defense of the statute of limitations is a bar to a claim, and, when it is interposed, it must be pleaded and proved. In the absence of such a defense, presented by objection, it was permissible [for the claimant] to file and prove [the] claim.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Freeman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.