Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 277 F.1d 650 - Davis v. Pullen

Davis v. Pullen’s Empirical Analysis

277 F. 650 · 1922

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
9
cited 9 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
February 1963
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions (9 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 1963

5 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions

14019221930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Rector Etc of Holy Trinity Church v. United States · New Jersey v. Anderson · United States v. Fisher · Cook Co Nat Bank v. United States · The United States v. The State Bank of North Carolina

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “there is a certain obvious injustice in giving the United States when engaged in an industrial and commercial venture, even although under war powers, superior rights over other creditors bearing like relations to insolvents.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.