Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

277 F.2d 441

Docket No. 18099.

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Hinds

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1960-04-18

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 1960

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Ford Motor Co. v. Busam Motor Sales, Inc. · Balicki v. Central Greyhound Lines, Inc.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1960-04-18

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Herbert W. Peterson, Birmingham, Ala., Claude D. Scruggs, Guntersville, Ala., Rives, Peterson, Pettus & Conway, Birmingham, Ala., of counsel, for appellant.

Joe Starnes, Starnes and Starnes, Guntersville, Ala., for appellee.

Before RIVES, Chief Judge, and HUTCHESON and BROWN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

This attempted appeal from an order denying defendant's motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, but granting its alternative motion for a new trial is not an appeal from a final decision of which this Court has jurisdiction. 28 U.S.C.A. 1291; Ford Motor Co. v. Busam Motor Sales, 6 Cir., 1950, 185 F.2d 531; Balicki v. Central Greyhound Lines, Inc., 3 Cir., 1945, 150 F.2d 402. The appeal is therefore.

¶2

Dismissed.

/277/f2d/441 · .json · Public domain