Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

277 F.2d 461

Docket No. 12990.

Schauffler v. Highway Truck Drivers & Helpers, Local 107, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America

Third Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued Feb. 16, 1960. Decided April 29, 1960.

Third Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1960-04-29

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently June 1974

7 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Schauffler v. Highway Truck Drivers & Helpers, Local 107

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1960-04-29

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Richard H. Markowitz, Philadelphia, Pa. (Richard Kirschner, Wilderman & Markowitz, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellants.

Winthrop A. Johns, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Thomas J. McDermott, Associate General Counsel, Jacques Schurre, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for appellee.

Before BIGGS, Chief Judge and STALEY and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

We are informed by counsel that the National Labor Relations Board has decided that no violation of Section 8(b)(4)(D), 29 U.S.C.A. 158, has been committed and that a motion for reconsideration has been denied. No substantial issue remains for our determination and it is obvious that the preliminary injunction appealed from is no longer vialble.

¶2

Accordingly we will vacate the judgment of the court below and remand the case to the end that the appellants may make application to the court below for the discharge of the preliminary injunction. 182 F.Supp. 556.

/277/f2d/461 · .json · Public domain