Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 277 F.2d 58 - Holz v. Smullan

Holz v. Smullan’s Empirical Analysis

277 F.2d 58 · 1960

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
3
states following
July 1985
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently July 1985

14 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

140196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291

Relies on Laskey Bros. of West Virginia, Inc. v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc. · Hoiness v. United States · State of Washington Bond Goodwin Tucker v. Superior Court of State of Washington for Spokane County · United States v. Ellicott · Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. Epperson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The notice of appeal shall specify the parties taking the appeal; shall designate the judgment or part thereof appealed from; and shall name the court to which the appeal is taken. * * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.