Bateman v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
277 F.2d 65 · 1960
Citation profile
19 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently November 2005 · most notably Hirabayashi v. United States (1987), United States v. Jalili (1991)
19 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2312 · 18 U.S.C. § 751 · 28 U.S.C. § 1651 · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Crowell v. Benson · United State v. Morgan · United States v. Mayer · United States v. Mayer · Duggins v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“it is probable that a different result would have occurred had the error not been made.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“* * * sentence [to] run concurrently with the sentence the defendant is now serving in the Kansas State Penitentiary.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Joslin v. Moseley““ * * * not show a lack of fair trial for the sort of miscarriage of justice which might call for immediate relief.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.