Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 277 F.3d 1305 - Patrick Oguejiofor v. Attorney General of the United States, Office of Immigration and Naturalization Service

Patrick Oguejiofor v. Attorney General of the United States, Office of Immigration and Naturalization Service’s Empirical Analysis

277 F.3d 1305 · 2002

Citation profile

57
cited by 57 later decisions
August 2020
most recently cited

34 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 57 later decisions — most recently August 2020 · most notably Mendoza v. U.S. Attorney General (2003), Yuen Jin v. Mukasey (2008)

34 federal appellate · 1 district ·

460200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Enrico St Cyr · Deboris Calcano-Martinezs v. Immigration and Naturalization Service · Hamid Mohammed v. John Ashcroft US Immigration and Naturalization Service · Federal Election Commission v. NRA Political Victory Fund · Tefel v. Reno

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 57 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To determine this Court's jurisdiction to review the BIA's decision, we must decide what version of the INA applies to Petitioner's appeal. To answer this question, we must determine when proceedings commenced against Petitioner.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Under our precedent, an alien has no constitutionally-protected right to discretionary relief or to be eligible for discretionary relief.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “we are not bound by a prior decision's sub silentio treatment of a jurisdictional question.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.