Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 277 F.3d 579 - United States of America v. Gabriel Lemmerer

United States of America v. Gabriel Lemmerer’s Empirical Analysis

277 F.3d 579 · 2002

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
May 2020
most recently cited

33 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 48 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2020 · most notably United States v. Soto-Beníquez (2003), United States v. Mooney (2002)

33 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

340200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Olano · United States v. Bagley · Kyles v. Whitley · Grupo Mexicano Desarrollos v. Alliance Bond Fund Inc

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a more effective strategy would likely have resulted”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[I]n delayed disclosure cases, we need not reach the question whether the evidence at issue was `material' under Brady unless the defendant first can show that defense counsel was prevented by the delay from using the disclosed material effectively in preparing and presenting the defendant's case.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “'must bear the burden of producing, at the very least, a prima facie showing of a plausible strategic option which the delay foreclosed' . . . or [how the delay] prevented defense counsel from using [the evidence] effectively.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.