Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 277 F.3d 811 - Henry Keller

Henry Keller’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
October 2021
most recently cited

1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently October 2021

1 district · 1 state decisions

150200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Catlin v. United States · Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De Guinee · Argentine Republic v. Amerada Hess Shipping Corp. · Republic of Argentina v. Weltover, Inc. · Rmi Titanium Company v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) A foreign state shall not be immune from the jurisdiction of courts of the United States or of the States in any case — [in which there is] (2) ... an act outside the territory of the United States in connection with a commercial activity of the foreign state elsewhere and that act causes a direct effect in the United States.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a foreign state shall be immune from the jurisdiction of the courts of the United States and of the States except as provided in sections 1605-1607 of this chapter.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The party claiming FSIA immunity bears the initial burden of proof establishing a prima facie case that it satisfies the FSIA’s definition of a foreign state; once this prima facie case is established, the burden of production shifts to the non-movant to show that an exception applies, [citation omitted] Nevertheless, the party claiming FSIA immunity retains the ultimate burden of persuasion throughout.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.