Vuktilaj v. Mukasey’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (§ 208 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Guang Run Yu v. Ashcroft · Pilica v. Ashcroft · BURBANO · Sylla v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Dorosh v. Ashcroft
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“it will undermine a claimant's efforts to meet his burden of proof-parlicularly when the claimant reasonably could have presented, but did not present, corroborating evidence to support the claim.” 277 Fed.Appx. at 559 . 3 . Gjyzi v. Ashcroft, 386 F.3d 710, 715 (6th Cir.2004), is distinguishable from the present case. We noted in Gjyzi that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.