Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 277 F. Supp. 2d 528 - DiPaolo v. Moran

277 F. Supp. 2d 528 - DiPaolo v. Moran’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
4
states following
September 2021
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1927 · 42 U.S.C. § 1988 · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 706 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp. · Link v. Wabash Railroad · Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission · Kay v. Ehrler · Thomas v. Capital Security Services, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[b]ecause a party proceeding pro se cannot have incurred attorneys' fees as an expense, a district court cannot order a violating party to pay a pro se litigant a reasonable attorney's fee as part of a sanction. * * * [T]he word `attorney' generally assumes some kind of agency (that is, attorney/client) relationship. The fees a lawyer might charge himself are not, strictly speaking, `attorney's fees.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “by representing his law firm, [the attorney litigant] created an attorney-client relationship, thereby diminishing, if not eviscerating, the primary reasoning for [prohibiting a pro se attorney from recovering fees].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “any party opposing [a] motion shall serve a brief in opposition ... within fourteen (14) days after service of the motion.... In the absence of a timely response, the motion may be granted as uncontested....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.