Singh v. Cigna Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78J (§ 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78M (§ 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78T (§ 20 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78U (§ 21d of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Foman v. Davis · Basic Inc. v. Levinson · Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“it's so important for every employee ... to handle, maintain, and report on [Cigna's financial] information in compliance with all laws and regulations,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Singh v. Cigna Corp.“subject to ... numerous and complex regulations and requirements that are frequently modified and subject to administrative discretion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Singh v. Cigna Corp.“Cigna has had a longstanding history of non-compliance with CMS requirements”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Singh v. Cigna Corp.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.