Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 277 Ga. 488 - Rollins v. State

Rollins v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
3
states following
May 2023
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently May 2023 · most notably State v. Henderson (2004), Alexander v. State (2015)

26 state decisions

150200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 241

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Hill v. Lockhart · Bradley v. Ohio · Williams v. Duffy · Brantley v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “All criminal defendants, including those who waive their right to trial and enter a guilty plea, are entitled to effective legal assistance. In order to show a constitutional violation of this Sixth Amendment right, [Sabillon] must (1) establish that [his] counsel's performance fell outside the range of competence for attorneys in criminal cases and (2) "establish the reasonable probability that, but for counsel's errors, [he] would not have pleaded guilty and would have insisted on going to trial."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “establish the reasonable probability that, but for counsel's errors, [he] would not have pleaded guilty and would have insisted on going to trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.