Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 277 Ga. 667 - Keck v. Harris

Keck v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
June 2021
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 667 (§ 467 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Curtiss-Wright Corporation v. General Electric Company · Rose v. Rose · Horne v. Drachman · Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. Wall · Georgia Department of Human Resources v. Sweat

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[b]efore a state law governing domestic relations will be overridden, it must do major damage to clear and substantial federal interests”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.