Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 277 GAAPP 185 - Jones v. State

Jones v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
February 2018
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Cain v. State · Thomas v. State · Sharpe v. State · Heard v. State · Escutia v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) whether the number of defendants will create confusion as to the evidence and the law applicable to each, (2) whether there is a danger that evidence admissible against one defendant will be considered against the other despite the court’s instructions, or whether the strength of the evidence against one defendant will engulf the other with a “spillover” effect, and (3) whether the defendants’ defenses are antagonistic to each other or to each other’s rights.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “will be affirmed absent an abuse of discretion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.