Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 277 Ga. App. 730 - Roberts v. State

277 Ga. App. 730 - Roberts v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Milam v. State · 251 Ga. App. 873 - Childress v. State · 211 Ga. App. 205 - McCluskey v. State · 244 Ga. App. 565 - Green v. State · 256 Ga. App. 712 - Thomas v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Otherwise, recent possession of stolen goods will be viewed as probative evidence of the crime and reviewed along with the other evidence in the case to determine whether any rational juror could find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “While the unexplained (or unsatisfactorily explained) possession of goods stolen in an armed robbery or burglary gives rise to an inference of guilt, it does not automatically support a guilty verdict.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.