Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 277 Kan. 109 - State v. Rivera

State v. Rivera’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
1
states following
April 2022
most recently cited

44 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently April 2022 · most notably State v. Engelhardt (2005), Flynn v. State (2006)

44 state decisions

180200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Barker v. Wingo · California v. Arizona · State v. Smallwood · State v. Otero · Winter v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[u]ntil there is some delay which is presumptively prejudicial, there is no necessity for inquiry into the other factors that go into the balance.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'The constitutional protection of a speedy trial attaches when one becomes accused and the criminal prosecution begins, usually by either an indictment, an information, or an arrest, whichever first occurs.' State v. Taylor, 3 Kan. App. 2d 316, 321 , 594 P.2d 262 (1979). ....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “None of these four factors, standing alone, is sufficient for finding a violation. Instead, the court must consider them together along with any other relevant circumstances.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.