State v. Graham’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
2 district · 30 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently July 2020 · most notably State v. Elnicki (2005), State v. Phillips (2014)
2 district · 30 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Pabst · Sengupta v. University of Alaska · State v. Scott · State v. Beach · State v. Bryant
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Since Graham did not object to the granting of a mistrial, the 'manifest necessity' standard is not applicable. The correct standard, where the defendant does not object, is the same standard as if Graham had consented to the mistrial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Kornelson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.