Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 277 Kan. 161 - State v. Abbott

State v. Abbott’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

45
cited by 45 later decisions
3
states following
April 2022
most recently cited

45 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently April 2022 · most notably State v. Ramirez (2004), State v. Oliver (2005)

45 state decisions

200200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Draper v. United States · United States v. Di Re · Maryland v. Pringle · State v. Grissom · State v. Faulkner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “" 'Probable cause is the reasonable belief that a specific crime has been committed and that the defendant committed the crime. Probable cause exists where the facts and circumstances within the arresting officers' knowledge and of which they had reasonably trustworthy information are sufficient in themselves to warrant a man of reasonable caution in the belief that an offense has been or is being committed. " 'When determining whether probable cause exists, an appellate court considers the totality of the circumstances, including all of the information in the officer's possession, fair inferences therefrom, and any other relevant facts, even if they may not be admissible on the issue of guilt.' " State v. Ramirez , 278 Kan. 402 , 406, 100 P.3d 94 (2004) (quoting State v. Abbott , 277 Kan. 161 , Syl. ¶¶ 2, 83 P.3d 794 [2004] ).”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'all of the information in the officer's possession, fair inferences therefrom, and any other relevant facts, even if they may not be admissible on 7 the issue of guilt.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.