Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 277 Md. 529 - State v. Ensor and Compton

State v. Ensor and Compton’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
March 2009
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently March 2009

19 state decisions

1201976198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Edwin Hale v. William Henkel · Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. United States · Deems v. Western Maryland Railway Co. · Bureau of Mines v. George's Creek Coal and Land Co. · Coblentz v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In the absence of such a holding and in the absence of a directive to the Attorney General to participate in an investigation [pursuant to Md. Const. Art. V, § 3] courts would be without authority to appoint an acting prosecutor or assistant counsel for the grand jury phase of any matter since their authority to appoint under ... Art. 10, § 41 is limited to instances where the appointment is “necessary from the absence, sickness, resignation or death of any State’s attorney.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[i]f advisable in a specific proceeding, a court may appoint an auditor, surveyor, court reporter, assistant counsel for the State, counsel for a party if authorized by law or rule, accountant, master, examiner, or other officer, and may require his presence in court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.