Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 277 N.C. 242 - State v. Lee

State v. Lee’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

65
cited by 65 later decisions
2
states following
March 2026
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 61 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 65 later decisions — most recently March 2026 · most notably State v. Brown (1987), State v. Ludlum (1981)

2 federal appellate · 61 state decisions

200197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Fenner · State v. Cochran · Wolfe v. State of North Carolina · State v. Smith · State v. Ross

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 65 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In the construction of statutes, the ejusdem generis rule is that where general words follow a designation of particular subjects or things, the meaning of the general words will ordinarily be presumed to be, and construed as, restricted by the particular designations and as including only things of the same kind, character and nature as those specifically enumerated.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A motion to quash can be properly allowed on the ground that the matter charged does not constitute a criminal offense. ... In ruling on a motion to quash, however, the court is not permitted to consider extraneous evidence, and when the defect must be established by evidence aliunde the record, the motion must be denied. [Citations omitted.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “When the words of a statute have not acquired a technical meaning, they must be construed in accordance with their common and ordinary meaning unless a definite meaning is apparent or definitely indicated by the context.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.