277 N.J. Super. 162 - State v. Marquez’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently October 2012
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bibby v. United States · Yates v. United States · Kelly v. Robinson · Newland v. Georgia · Contemporary Mission, Inc. v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The two psychiatrists — two psychologists, I am sorry, two psychologists that came in here yesterday were a joke. Absolute joke. They were laughing. When you consider what they had to say to you, a lot of mumbo-jumbo, they hid behind words. They couched everything in terms of words____ These guys get on the scene 17 months later now, they come to the scene and all of a sudden he cannot — can’t understand English. I don’t know if that’s so or Dr. Rotgers figured he would get somebody else on the tab here that can bill $100 an hour for their time and services and come into court here. My friend Frank Dyer, bring him in. He can earn a couple of bucks____ You know what the most telling portion of this put-up job, the travesty to put on you ... do you remember that long rambling hypothetical situation Miss Kean gave both the psychologists? It took a long time. Assume a lot of facts, assume this; assume that; assume another thing. The first — what significance is that to you? The first words literally out of both of their mouths were identical. Do you remember what they said? Yes, I put some significance on that. Yes, he had some problems. Putting the blood on that ID card indicated to me extreme psychosis. It is like they were reading it from a script. And it did come like later on in their testimony. It was fairly, virtually the first things out of their mouths. Most respectfully, the first thing. You know, if that isn’t a put-up job, if that is not rehearsed, if that isn’t a tra”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Smith“A person is guilty of burglary if, with purpose to commit an offense therein he: (1) [e]nters a ... structure ... unless the structure was at the time open to the public or the actor is licensed or privileged to enter.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“mere entry into the apartment in violation of a domestic violence restraining order was itself [not] a sufficient basis to convict [defendant] of burglary”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.