277 N.J. Super. 311 - State v. Crumb’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
25 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently December 2016 · most notably State v. Jenkins (2004), Masters v. People (2002)
25 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Barclay v. Florida · Sims v. Central Intelligence Agency · Bottone v. United States · State v. Carter · State v. Crisantos (Arriagas)
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A wider range of evidence is admissible to establish motive or intent than is permitted in support of other issues.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[p]re-trial motions on evidence issues should be granted only sparingly”). 8 . The State argues that the trial court improperly considered the records of the previous trials as virtual surrogates in reaching its evi-dentiary rulings because the records are hearsay, The State did not object when the trial court took judicial notice of those records, and in any event, the trial court is not bound by the Rules of Evidence, save for those involving privilege, in making its threshold evi-dentiary determinations. See Tex. R. Evid. 104(a) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Although this material does not mention black people, it does have probative value in establishing defendant’s commitment as a “skinhead” to racial confrontation and his adherence to theories of racial supremacy. Thus, it tends to reinforce and give context to defendant’s expressions of hostility toward blacks, and would rebut any expressed or implied suggestion that the written material referring to blacks was an isolated aberration. [Ibid.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.