Johnson v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
1979
Citation profile
55 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 55 later decisions — most recently October 2018 · most notably 72 N.C. App. 409 - Weaver v. Weaver (1985), Hanks v. Hanks (1980)
55 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 17 Cal. 3d 738 - In Re Marriage of Fonstein · Painter v. Painter · Stern v. Stern · Hertz v. Hertz · State v. West
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[ejxactitude is not required of the trial court in the valuation of assets in a dissolution proceeding; it is only necessary that the value arrived at lies within a reasonable range of figures.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage““First, the difference between the fair market value of the partnership’s assets, both real and personal, and its liabilities is determined. Next, the partners’ capital accounts, which are debts of the partnership [citation], are subtracted from that figure. Out of the remainder, the partner’s percentage interest is determined. The partner’s capital account in full is an additional, separate asset to be included in the division of property. [Citation.]” ( 277 N.W.2d 208, 213 .)”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“expressly considered the efforts expended by appellant in acquiring the Arizona property subsequent to commencement of the dissolution proceeding and awarded appellant the entire interest in that property”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Gill v. Gill
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.